The end of an illness. The end of a day. Just as the biological components of any illness are not within our control so is the end of the day inevitable. However, with the end of each day there is the beginning of another and so with mental health. Mental health is by definition, and at many levels, an unstable and destabilizing experience, but as the day's of the week cycle through so do the symptoms of an individual's mental health.
The end is never assured, unless the end has arrived and when it has arrived we move forward and into the beginnings of a new experience. The main problem of most mental health concerns is the repetition of the symptoms. The inevitability of the symptoms return or the painful realization that on some level the symptoms are always present.
It may be beneficial then to not look for "the end" but to instead begin to look at the symptoms with a new perspective. The trouble is, how does one see a "new" perspective when the problem has been staring them directly in the face for months or even years. The videos on Register ®eality are meant to give the viewer the opportunity to begin seeing and hearing their mental health concern from a new perspective.
There never can be a guarantee when dealing with an area, such as mental health, that can be so hard to understand and pin down, but there is a specific strategy being employed in the Register ®eality video series--and maybe it is a cycle, like the day to night, that once we understand it we can begin to work with it and maybe even work our way right out of it.
thend (thi-nd) noun 1. The state of mind produced with the temporary psychological "holding" and maintenance of a Constant Variably Determined Contradiction [i.e. a "living" paradox] that when fully actualized translates to a physiological experience that becomes indistinguishable from the original psychological holding subsequently becoming permanent.
Initially, the CDVC, or living paradox, is exclusively held within the mind; however, upon full realization of it's impact--which is its terminus and dissolution--the CDVC then affords the individual maintaining it actionable evidence that knowledge + experience, does in fact, prove the axiomatic statement, mind = body. [Please note "termini" do NOT have beginnings]
In Psycho-Contextual Analysis (PCA), when an individual is capable of maintaining a CDVC [for whatever the arbitrary length of time required of that individual] it leads to the full realization of the individual's infinite nature. This state of mind is considered to be a Thend. The experience of a thend has a unique psychological quality -- Generally, all previously repressed negative and positive experiences, with their concurrent symbolic forms, are systemically, immediately expressed in one full and complete symbolic utterance, the verbal form of thend, i.e. to thend. See below for further elucidation and exemplification.
An example of a CDVC is the experience of "black/white." Traditionally, these two opposing perceptions are understood as mutually exclusive; however, when an analysand is capable of maintaining both black & white in their mind utilizing the specialized "Sound/\Image" technique developed and utilized within Psycho-Contextual Analysis a Thend can be actualized.
A CVDC requires at least one similar structural quality [In the case of black/white the binding quality is "light"], but CVDC's are not limited to a qualitative singularity. The similar quality acts as an experiential or cognitive point of connectivity which breathes life into the experience/knowledge acquisition the CVDC provides that would otherwise be considered simply as two dissimilar experiences, objects or ideas compacted into one statement, also known as a "dead" paradox.
The CVDC is distinguished from a dead paradox, in that the CVDC does not require the thanatological process of narritivization, i.e. the creation of a story that belies or hides the logical fact of its internal incoherence, e.g. Zeno's paradox, The Paradox of the Heap, all of which contain multiple and extend inanimate/static linguistic utterances that when combined culminate in a fundamentally illogical conclusion. The dead paradox only has the appearance of biological viability or logical sense.
When fully analyzed all traditionally considered paradoxes are simple conflations of dissimilar ideas connected by a quasi-related concept--the opposite of a CDVC or living paradox. Dead paradoxes are markedly determined as "wordplay," a base-level form of doublespeak, and conversely living paradoxes or CDVC's have an antimicrobial, antidotal, or inoculating effect for the conscious mind capable of realizing one--this inhibits the cognitive dissonance that is normally experienced by non-inoculated minds when hearing a paradox or experiencing a psychologically traumatic event.
Fortunately or unfortunately, depending upon whether the individual ingesting a CDVC has had enough preparation [Individually determined/Indefinite number of Psycho-Contextual interventions or an equally extensive immersion in a psychologically validated video series--e.g. the only verified to date of this article being Register ®eality which, it self, is incomplete] there are at least two dead, thanatologico-paradoxical paths that can lead to a true CDVC experience, a.k.a. a thend.
Dead Path One: When you lose this contradiction by accepting, as true, a locally determined event (a body) or a temporally detailed state (of mind) you (are) actually losing yourself by becoming lost in one or the other .:. You are, are you becoming lost . . This is how-would you, you do, forever : how else would-do you, ever?
Path 2/to Death: You think you are consciously doing something only if Thinking is doing (Mind/\Body)—Thend.
In PCA the term thend is considered to have two simultaneous grammatical forms, as noun and as verb. The context of the term's usage--be it to denote a specific and circumscribed action within the process of being analyzed its verbal form, and when denoting the vocal/verbalized process that culminates in a specific psychological state of mind is considered the term's nounal form.
The verbal form is indicative of a unique verbalization between the analysand and analyst The action of thending indicates the full or potentiality for a fully completed, or circumscripted analysis. The nounal form of thend is the full "circumscription" of an analysis which occurs when the analysand’s root psychological disjunction is completely re-constituted, in vivo; and a unified psyche is achieved as all symptoms associated with the analysand's neurosis are dissolved i.e. the neurosis is cured. Thend, as noun, designates the specific state of mind associated with this complete circumscription and the verbal action, to thend, is the behavioral indication that a state of mind thend has occurred or is nearing.
Thending can be, either, consciously or unconsciously experienced by the analysand—if unconscious, the analysis is not complete but nearing (Unfortunately, when unconscious this is most often experienced by the analysand as his/her analysis seeming to be indefinitely distant or perpetually forestalled).
Regardless of the analysand's conscious experience of the thend, once a thend is consciously acknowledged the analysand must be capable of the purposeful and repeatable thending to another individual.
As a qualifying event a thend consists of one and only one type of quantitative criteria, the complete psychological revocation, traditionally by a skilled practitioner of Psycho-Contextual Analysis, whereby the analysand is “Prescripted,” unconsciously as well as consciously. To be “prescripted” is to have a set of prescriptivist statements—which lead the analysand down a path—when wielded by a skilled practitioner, that has the psychologically disruptive capacity whereby a fissure is created in the psyche of the analysand. With the existence of this fissure the analyst may “impressionate” (please see urban dictionary https://www.google.com/amp/www.urbandictionary.com/define.php%3Fterm=impressionate&=true ) the most elemental layer of the psyche. At the point the core psyche becomes completely bear to the analyst and at some point as well the analysand can tell the other who or what they can be until the analysand completes their analysis through proving the analyst correct, this thereby qualifies the fundamental principle that validates the phenomenal experience (a non-mental experience—is phenomenal) of the IDEA (not experience or IKEA) but the physical experience of the idea of pure contextual perception being phenomenal and mental—by his/her analyst psychological